Minggu, 11 Januari 2009

Oracle Board of Directors

Larry Ellison

Larry Ellison
Chief Executive Officer
Review Mr. Ellison's Biography

Jeff Henley

Jeff Henley
Chairman
Review Mr. Henley's Biography

Charles Phillips

Charles Phillips
President
Review Mr. Phillips' Biography

Safra Catz

Safra Catz
President
Review Ms. Catz' Biography


Source : http://www.oracle.com/corporate/board.html

Intel Corporate Officers

Biographies

Corporate Officers



Craig R. Barrett
Chairman of the Board

Paul S. Otellini
President and Chief Executive Officer


Executive Vice Presidents



Andy D. Bryant
Executive Vice President
Finance and Enterprise Services
Chief Administrative Officer

Sean M. Maloney
Executive Vice President
Chief Sales and Marketing Officer

David Perlmutter
Executive Vice President
General Manager, Mobility Group

Arvind Sodhani
Executive Vice President
President, Intel Capital

Senior Vice Presidents


Robert J. Baker
Senior Vice President
General Manager, Technology and Manufacturing Group

Anand Chandrasekher
Senior Vice President
General Manager, Ultra Mobility Group

Patrick P. Gelsinger
Senior Vice President
General Manager, Digital Enterprise Group

William M. Holt
Senior Vice President
General Manager, Technology and Manufacturing Group

Eric B. Kim
Senior Vice President
General Manager, Digital Home Group

Patricia Murray
Senior Vice President
Director, Human Resources

D. Bruce Sewell
Senior Vice President
General Counsel

Vice Presidents


Sohail U. Ahmed
Vice President
Director, Logic Technology Development

Diane M. Bryant
Vice President
Chief Information Officer

Louis J. Burns
Vice President
General Manager, Digital Health Group

Douglas F. Busch
Vice President
Chief Technology Officer, Digital Health Group

Deborah S. Conrad
Vice President
General Manager, Corporate Marketing Group

Robert B. Crooke
Vice President
General Manager, Business Client Group

Leslie S. Culbertson
Vice President
Director, Finance

Shmuel (Mooly) Eden
Vice President
General Manager, Mobile Platforms Group

Ron Friedman
Vice President
General Manager, Mobile Microprocessors Group

Ravi Jacob
Vice President
Treasurer

Renee J. James
Vice President
General Manager, Software and Services Group

John N. Johnson
Vice President
Chief Information Officer

Thomas M. Kilroy
Vice President
General Manager, Digital Enterprise Group

Cary I. Klafter
Vice President, Legal and Corporate Affairs
Director, Corporate Legal
Corporate Secretary

Brian M. Krzanich
Vice President
General Manager, Manufacturing and Supply Chain

Justin R. Rattner
Intel Senior Fellow
Vice President
Director, Corporate Technology Group and
Intel Chief Technology Officer

Stacy J. Smith
Vice President
Chief Financial Officer

Stephen L. Smith
Vice President
Director, Digital Enterprise Group Operations

William A. Swope
Vice President
General Manager, Corporate Affairs Group

Richard G. A. Taylor
Vice President
Director, Human Resources

Source : http://www.intel.com/pressroom/execbios.htm?iid=pr1_ln_biographies

Microsoft Board of Directors




Bill Gates

Chairman

James I. Cash Jr., Ph.D.

James E. Robison Professor & Senior Associate Dean, Emeritus, Harvard Business School

Steve Ballmer

Chief Executive Officer

Dina Dublon

Former Chief Financial Officer, JPMorgan Chase

Raymond V. Gilmartin

Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Merck & Co., Inc

Reed Hastings

Founder, Chairman and CEO, Netflix, Inc

David F. Marquardt

General Partner, August Capital

Charles H. Noski

Former Vice Chairman, AT&T Corporation

Dr. Helmut Panke

Former Chairman of the Board of Management, BMW AG



Source : http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/bod/bod.aspx




Dell Executive team

Executive Team

Ensuring that customers are satisfied every time they interact with Dell is a goal owned by every Dell team member. The Dell Executive Leadership Team sets the strategic direction for how we'll continue to keep customers at the forefront of all we do - from designing and delivering services and solutions that meet the unique and evolving needs of our customers to developing innovative new products that deliver a superior customer experience.


Michael S. DellMichael S. Dell
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer





Brad R. AndersonBrad R. Anderson
Senior Vice President, Business Product Group
Paul D. BellPaul D. Bell
Senior Vice President and President, Americas

Michael R. CannonMichael R. Cannon
President, Global Operations
Jeffrey W. ClarkeJeffrey W. Clarke
Senior Vice President, Business Product Group

Andrew EsparzaAndrew Esparza
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Stephen J. FeliceStephen J. Felice
Senior Vice President and President, Asia-Pacific/Japan

Ronald G. GarriquesRonald G. Garriques
President, Global Consumer Group
Brian T. GladdenBrian T. Gladden
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Mark JarvisMark Jarvis
Chief Marketing Officer
David A. MarmontiDavid A. Marmonti
Senior Vice President and President, Europe, Middle East and Africa

Timothy W. MattoxTimothy W. Mattox
Vice President, Strategy
Stephen F. SchuckenbrockStephen F. Schuckenbrock
Senior Vice President and President, Global Services, and Chief Information Officer

Lawrence P. TuLawrence P. Tu
Senior Vice President, General Counsel



Source : http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/about_dell/company/leadership/executive_team?c=us&l=en&s=corp&~ck=anavml

Executive Team of HP

EXECUTIVE TEAM OF HP

Mark Hurd
HP Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President

Pete Bocian
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
Ann M. Livermore
Executive Vice President, Technology Solutions Group
Todd Bradley
Executive Vice President, Personal Systems Group
Randy Mott
Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Michael J. Holston
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Marcela Perez de Alonso
Executive Vice President, Human Resources
Vyomesh Joshi
Executive Vice President, Imaging and Printing Group
Shane Robison
Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy and Technology Officer
Cathie Lesjak
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Prith Banerjee
Senior Vice President, Research, and Director, HP Labs
Michael Mendenhall
Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
Don Grantham
Senior Vice President and Chief Sales Officer


Source : http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/execteam/


Kamis, 08 Januari 2009

Intel Strategy

Intel Strategy Draws New Competitors

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz., February 27, 2008 - Intel is now battling with new competitors in addition to known adversaries—AMD and IBM—making the next few years competitive for the silicon giant, reports In-Stat (http://www.in-stat.com). Due to anticipated slower growth and lower pricing in the PC market, Intel's key base since the 1980s, Intel is looking to new markets for growth opportunities, the high-tech market research firm says.

"Intel's CEO, Paul Otellini, identified ultra-mobile PCs (UMPCs)/Mobile Internet Devices (MIDs), emerging markets PCs as key targets (allegedly worth US $10 billion each), and consumer electronics, giving the competition ample warning to prepare for Intel's onslaught," says Jim McGregor, In-Stat Principal Analyst. "Intel's expansion into emerging form factors, such as MIDs, with low-power products expands its list of competitors, particularly those in the ARM processor camp."

Recent research by In-Stat found the following:

* AMD will shadow Intel's move into emerging form factors with accelerated processing units (APU)
* IBM will continue pushing the POWER processor architecture for servers and consumer electronics, but In-Stat believes it may exit the semiconductor business within a decade due to high fab costs, competition, and changing business models
* ARM suppliers and VIA will compete with Intel for MID/UMPC, what In-Stat refers to as Ultra Mobile Devices (UMDs), design wins
* Intel will maintain its leadership position in computing, but faces competition and difficulty overcoming other barriers in consumer electronics

Recent In-Stat research, Intel Competitor Line-Up: Challenges to the Industry Leader (#IN0804280SI), covers the competitive landscape for Intel. It provides extensive analysis of Intel's key competitors' strategies and how they are each responding to Intel's new strategy. Intel's strengths and weaknesses and those of its competitors are examined in detail along with the opportunities and threats that each company currently faces.

For more information on this research or to purchase it online, please visit: http://www.instat.com/catalog/scatalogue.asp?id=68 or contact a sales representative: http://www.instat.com/sales.asp

The price is $1,995 (US).

This research is part of In-Stat's PC Technology service. This service tracks key technologies and usage models driving changes in computing form factors and the computing market through the use of In-Stat's technical knowledge, In-Stat surveys of the market, and contact throughout the semiconductor and computing industry by In-Stat analysts.


source : http://www.in-stat.com/press.asp?ID=2249&sku=IN0804280SI

Microsoft Strategy

Microsoft Strategy

Businessweek has an article about a memo they obtained that discusses Microsoft's new strategy (click on the MS logo to view their new Windows Live Beta). The new strategy consists of launching tons of apps over the next few months that they hope will attract users in droves.

A slew of other features are on the way, the company says. "Over the next 3-6 months, we'll ship more innovative technology into the marketplace than during our entire 10-year history," writes Cole, who said in February he'll be taking a year's leave of absence starting in April.

How will all that innovation be delivered? Services will be introduced with what he calls a "rolling thunder" approach. "We'll release new services as they become available, upgrade existing services, and launch marketing efforts in global phases," the memo says.

Sounds sort of like the way Google does things, doesn't it? Microsoft no doubt sees Google as a threat, and they have a hell of a financial war chest to take into battle. The biggest difference I can see as an outside observer is that Microsoft seems much more concerned with the revenue generating potential of the applications they will be providing. I think that is a good move. Could Google's eventual downfall be that they provided too much for free?

source : http://www.businesspundit.com/microsofts-strategy/

Dell Computer's Strategy

Dell Computer's Strategy

Dell Computer's strategy was built around a number of core elements: build-to-order manufacturing, mass customization, partnerships with suppliers, just-in-time components inventories, direct sales, market segmentation, customer service, and extensive data and information sharing with both supply partners and customers. Through this strategy, the company hoped to achieve what Michael Dell called "virtual integration"—a stitching together of Dell's business with its supply partners and customers in real time such that all three appeared to be part of the same organizational team.5

source : www.mhhe.com/business/management/thompson/11e/case/dell5.html - 46k -

HP server strategy

HP server strategy

1. Excelling in a 24/7 World
2. Successful IT Consolidation
3. Airbus UK Reaches New Heights
4. Partners in the Race

Source : www.hp.com

Minggu, 04 Januari 2009

SWOT Analysis Apple

SWOT Analysis Apple.

Strengths.

* Apple is a very successful company. Sales of its iPod music player had increased its second quarter profits to $320 (June 2005). The favourable brand perception had also increased sales of Macintosh computers. So iPod gives the company access to a whole new series of segments that buy into other parts of the Apple brand. Sales of its notebooks products is also very strong, and represents a huge contribution to income for Apple.
* Brand is all-important. Apple is one of the most established and healthy IT brands in the World, and has a very loyal set of enthusiastic customers that advocate the brand. Such a powerful loyalty means that Ample not only recruits new customers, it retains them i.e. they come back for more products and services from Apple, and the company also has the opportunity to extend new products to them, for example the iPod.

Weaknesses.

* It is reported that the Apple iPod Nano may have a faulty screen. The company has commented that a batch of its product has screens that break under impact, and the company is replacing all faulty items. This is in addition to problems with early iPods that had faulty batteries, whereby the company offered customers free battery cases.
* There is pressure on Apple to increase the price of its music download file, from the music industry itself. Many of these companies make more money from iTunes (i.e. downloadable music files) than from their original CD sales. Apple has sold about 22 million iPod digital music players and more than 500 million songs though its iTunes music store. It accounts for 82% of all legally downloaded music in the US. The company is resolute, but if it gives in to the music producers, it may be perceived as a commercial weakness.
* Early in 2005 Apple announced that it was to end its long-standing relationship with IBM as a chip supplier, and that it was about to switch to Intel. Some industry specialists commented that the swap could confuse Apple's consumers.

Opportunities.

* Apple has the opportunity to develop its iTunes and music player technology into a mobile phone format. The Rokr mobile phone device was developed by Motorola. It has a colour screen, stereo speakers and a advance camera system. A version of Apple's iTunes music store has been developed for the phone so users can manage the tracks they store on it. Downloads are available via a USB cable, ands software on the handset pauses music if a phone call comes in. New technologies and strategic alliances offer opportunities for Apple.
* Podcasts are downloadable radio shows that can be downloaded from the Internet, and then played back on iPods and other MP3 devices at the convenience of the listener. The listener can subscribe to Podcasts for free, and ultimately revenue could be generated from paid for subscription or through revenue generated from sales of other downloads.

Threats.

* The biggest threat to IT companies such as Apple is the very high level of competition in the technology markets. Being successful attracts competition, and Apple works very hard on research and development and marketing in order to retain its competitive position. The popularity of iPod and Apple Mac are subject to demand, and will be affected if economies begin to falter and demand falls for their products.
* There is also a high product substitution effect in the innovative and fast moving IT consumables market. So iPod and MP3 rule today, but only yesterday it was CD, DAT, and Vinyl. Tomorrow's technology might be completely different. Wireless technologies could replace the need for a physical music player.
* In 2005 Apple won a legal case that forced Bloggers to name the sources of information that pre-empted the launch of new Apple products. It was suspect that Apple's own employees had leaked confidential information about their new Asteroid product. The three individuals prosecuted, all owned Apple tribute sites, and were big fans of the company's products. The blogs had appeared on their sites, and they were forced to reveal their source. The ruling saw commercial confidentiality as more important as the right to speech of individuals. Apple are vulnerable to leaks that could cost them profits.

source : http://www.marketingteacher.com/SWOT/apple_swot.htm

SWOT Analysis: Microsoft Corporation

SWOT Analysis: Microsoft Corporation

By Arthur W. Hafner , Ph.D., M.B.A. and
Erica L. Hibbert
May 31, 2001

Strengths

*Applications and operations divisions along with recently created online service network divisions (MSN)
*Flexible workforce through contingent workers for seasonal/cyclical projects
*Loyal, hardworking, and diverse workforce (20% minority, 26% women) who, in addition to good compensation, have an opportunity to do well financially through stock purchases
*Multinational corporation operating through regional subsidiaries to minimize cultural differences in more than 60 countries
*New product, Neptune , is a Window's interface and is an example of smart software
*Relatively rapid product development processes that allow for timely updating and release of new products
*Revenues and profits rising at 30% a year with merger/acquisition or investment in 92 companies over past five years
*Software products have high name recognition, broad-based corporate and consumer acceptance (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access), and numerous powerful features that are in use worldwide, thereby promoting standardization and competitive advantage through their ease of integration and cost-effectiveness
*Top rating from Fortune for best company to work at and most admired company
*Windows 95, 98, 2000 series, and Windows NT are globally known as the PC desktop operating system with a market share of about 88%
*World's largest software company with global name recognition and strong reputation for innovative products

Weaknesses

*Between 1990-1995, Microsoft leadership failed to correctly anticipate the growth or popularity of the Internet
*Bill Gates has become Microsoft's chief software architect but has not yet developed a substantially new line of products
*Dependency on hardware manufacturers to pre-install Microsoft's PC operating system
*Downside of product launches and deadlines contributes substantially to employee burnout
*Employee turnover has increased from 6% for a ten year period to 7.4%
*Falling sales in the operating systems and server software sectors
*Frequent reorganization, red tape, and autocratic atmosphere dampen employee creativity leading to a loss of key personnel and chilling of communication and innovation; 5-layers of management
*IRS audits in 1989 and 1990 revealed employment status of contingent workers for whom Microsoft did not withhold taxes nor allow to participate in Microsoft's Savings Plus Plan or Employee Stock Purchase Plan, leading to a finding of tax liability for Microsoft in the "permatemps" Vizcaino litigation
*Little or no significant presence in the wireless market and Windows CE has been disappointing
*

Not a key player in the Internet space and few products for Internet applications
*

Perceived by many as a cut-throat competitor that uses its dominant market position to marginalize competition by stealing/destroying the competition's products, stifling product innovation, and decreasing the availability of competitor products
* have a single application focus and do not work well with or on-top of other products
* has suffered because of entanglement in antitrust and "permatemps" Vizcaino litigation

Opportunities

* global telecommunication costs open new markets as people connect to the Internet
* trial Judge Thomas P. Jackson's breach of judicial discretion and conduct in the Microsoft antitrust case clouded the proceedings in Microsoft's favor
* phone applications and exploitation of personal digital assistants represent a growth industry so that strategic alliances could provide Microsoft with opportunity in a market where it currently has little or no significant presence
* among people for Internet access
* demand for personal computers in American and global markets remains strong despite the growth and increasing popularity of personal handheld devices

Threats

* and Linux threaten Microsoft's 88% market share of the desktop operating market
* 1993-95, Sun Microsystems, Netscape, Oracle, IBM, AOL, and other companies moved into the Internet space and defined it while Microsoft failed to anticipate its growth or popularity
* exchange rates affect demand for application/operation software and hardware, and fluctuating currencies can negatively impact revenues in the global marketplace
* of Justice antitrust litigation and current appeal creates uncertainty among employees since its outcome is not known
* manufacturers (Sun Microsystems, Oracle, IBM) have collaborated on new platform technologies that replicate much of the value of Windows
* manufacturers (Sun Microsystems, Oracle, IBM, AOL, and Apple) are issuing their own pre-bundled programs on their own hardware
* influence growing from 7% in 1998 to 17% in 1999
* computers, mobile-phones, personal digit assistants, entertainment-oriented hand-held computers, and similar wireless products for Internet access do not require Window operating system products
* development of mobile devices that will displace/replace personal computers
* or economic slowdown in the U.S. or global market impacts personal computer equipment sales and their need for an operating systems
* piracy of commercial and consumer applications software on a global scale threatens revenue streams
* life cycle is shorter and shorter
* dominates high-end mission-critical applications and its customers do not believe Windows can handle these operations

This SWOT Analysis was prepared by
Arthur W. Hafner and Erica L. Hibbert

Souce : http://www.bsu.edu/libraries/ahafner/awh-th-swot-ms.html

SWOT Analysis DELL

2. SWOT Analysis Dell.

Strengths.

* Dell is the World's largest PC maker. Profits for the 3 months to July 2005 were in excess of $1 billion US, representing a growth of around 28%. For the last couple of years it has held its position as market leader (it took it from rivals Hewlett-Packard). The Dell brand is one of the best known and renowned computer brands in the World.
* Dell cuts out the retailer and supplies directly to the customers. It uses information technology, and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) approaches to capture data on its loyal consumers. So a customer selects a generic PC model, and then adds items and upgrades until the PC is kitted out to the customer's own specification. Components are made by suppliers, never by Dell. PC's are assembled using relatively cheap labour. You can even keep track of your delivery by contacting customer services, based in India. The finished goods are then dropped off with the customer by courier. Dell has total command of the supply chain.

Weaknesses.

* The company has such a huge range of products and components from many suppliers from a plethora of countries, that there is the occasional product recall that can cause Dell some embarrassment. In 2004 Dell had to recall 4.4 million laptop adapters because of a fear that they could overheat, causing electric shocks or fires.
* Dell is a computer maker, not a compute manufacturer. It buys from a group of concentrated hi-tech component manufacturers. Whilst this is a tremendous advantage in terms of business operations, allowing Dell to focus on marketing and logistics, the company is reliant on a few large suppliers, and to an extent is locked in for periods of time (i.e. unable to switch supply dues to the lack of large suppliers in the World).

Opportunities.

* Kevin Rollins replaced Michael Dell in 2004 as Dell's Chief Executive Officer. Dell remained the company's Chairman. Despite founder Dell's massive success, new blood and a change in management thinking could lead the company into a new, even more profitable period. Dell was born in 1965, and founded Dell in 1984 with $1000 whilst studying at the University of Texas. He became the youngest Fortune 500 CEO in 1992, and will be a tough act to follow.
* Dell is pursuing a diversification strategy by introducing many new products to its range. This initially has meant good such as peripherals including printers and toners, but now also included LCD televisions and other non-computing goods. So Dell compete against iPod and other consumer electronics brands.
* Dell is making and selling low-cost, low-price computers to PC retailers in the United States. The PC's are unbranded and should not be recognised as being Dell when the consumer makes a purchase. Rebranding and rebadging for retailers, although a departure for Dell, gives the company new market segments to attack with the associated marketing costs.

Threats.

* The single biggest problem for Dell is the competitive rivalry that exists in the PC market globally. As with all profitable brands, retaliation from competitors and new entrants to the market pose potential threats. Dell sources from Far Eastern nations where labour costs remain low, but there is nothing stopping competitors doing the same - even sourcing the same or similar components from the same or similar suppliers. Remember, Dell is a PC maker, not a PC manufacturer.
* Dell, being global in its marketing and operations, is exposed to fluctuations in the World currency markets. Although it is a very lean organization, orders do have to be placed some time ahead due to their size or value. Changes in exchange rates could leave the company exposed to potential loses in parts of its supply chain.

Source:
www.marketingteacher.com/SWOT/dell_swot.htm

Hewlett-Packard SWOT Analysis

1. Hewlett-Packard SWOT Analysis

Strengths
Hewlett-Packard is a global technology company and after its merger with Compaq it became world’s biggest computer hardware and peripherals company in the world, ranking 20 in the Fortune 500 list. Company is doing business in more then 170 countries including the ones that are developing and under-developed. Being a large company gives HP many advantages like dominating the market for printers, both laser and inkjet, and both for consumers and companies using the economies of scale. The company is also taking an active role in developing the capacity of new markets all around the world, engaging with other multinational corporations, non-governmental organizations and other world governing bodies to reignite the competitiveness at home and abroad through policies and strategies that can support free-market economies. This is one of the reasons that makes HP a leading technology company in the growing IT markets (HP Annual Report, 2003).
Hewlett-Packard generated nearly $6.1 billion in cash flow from its operations and increased its cash and equivalents by 3 billion in 2003 (Datamonitor, 2004). Debt levels in this year were also very low which was significantly lower then the previous year. This is a great advantage which enables the company to increase its investments.
HP always recognized the need to compete in global markets. Product diversity of the company is another big advantage that enables the company to hold its position even in the times of recession. As long as the products are good and have reasonable prices there will be a demand. Company has a product span from calculators to laser printers , from notebook computers to servers. The company has a long history of inventions and innovations until it came to this stage. Research and Development (R&D) is foucused on key growth areas like rich digital media, mobility, management softwares and security. HP knows that enterprises and consumers might have different needs, but the technology requirements to meet those needs are usually the same. HP labs continue to research future technologies such as nanotechnology to ensure that the company is investing in longt-term growth and competitiveness.
After the acquisition of Compaq the new company formed four new divisions including enterprise systems group, imaging and printing group, HP services and Personal systems. This gave the opportunity to the company to broaden out the product line so that it could have a compelling offering against (International Business Machines) IBM and (enterprise content management) EMC companies (Connor, 2002).
There is a shared sense of mission among the employees at HP. The company is also one of the first corporations in U.S that used the “management by objective� approach. “Management by objective is an art of management and technique whereby the actions of analysis, direction and control are focused on the end result� (Trautmann , 2003). Executives in HP also created an informal workplace which encouraged employees to use their first names. They visited as many departments as possible without appointments and scheduled meetings and talked with line workers as often as with managers in order to understand the operations. The company endorse the idea that employees have as valid interest in the performance as do shareholders. This gave the company a unique strength among its competitors.
Hewlett-Packard has a strong position in Europe unlike many of its competitors. The company focuses on expanding its sales of PC market using its satellites in Geneva, Switzerland and Boeblingen, Germany. The company is expecting to remain dominant computer vendor in this region for a long time by increasing the investments to develop its satellites.
Today, network and communications technology has made it possible to access information from almost everywhere. HP has a long history of innovation in the area of mobility including a broad span of products from handhelds and notebooks to fault-tolerant servers, which form the backbone of the telecommunications industry. The company has a leadership in public and wireless local-area networks which enables HP to integrate its printing products and softwares using Bluetooth technology so that people can even print from their mobile phones. The company also focuses on Internet-protocol (IP) telephone technology to leverage networks for voice and video communication that drives cost savings for service providers and customers which is an important strength among competitors.

Weaknesses
Hewlett-Packard’s majority of earnings are coming from its printing supplies division. This makes the company’s total earnings extremely sensitive to this segment. which is a potential weakness for HP.
HP also lost shares in the PC and server markets between 2002-2003 while its top competitors Dell and IBM increased their shares in the same period. The company’s profitability is currently very low at the server and storage markets. Some analysts evaluate HP’s weak peformance as signaling a trend for IT spending (Rivlin, 2004).


Opportunities
Hp expects recovery in the personal computer market during 2004. The company launched more then 150 products between 2003 and 2004. Product launches are expected to support the growth of higher margin.
HP is currently seeking opportunities in the Business Process Outsourcing area which IBM indicated $20 billion in 2004. The company has set up a contact center in Bangalore, India. This will enable the company to get closer to the consumers and understand what support processes are working and not working (Ribeiro J., 2004).

Threats
There is a great pricing pressure in the overall PC market. Dell is a strong competitor and has a focus on the standardized computer markets. The company eliminates inventories more efficiently then any of its competitors which is a main threat for HP.
HP recently had to deal with a number of lawsuits which have been filed for various reasons like unfair business practices and patent rights from other companies and academic institutions like Cornell University . The outcome of these events may create bad reputation which can affect the operations.


Bibliography:



1. Datamonitor. (2004). Hewlett-Packard Company. Retrieved October 14, 2004 from
http://www.datamonitor.com

2. Hewlett –Packard Development Company, L.P. (2004). HP 2003 Annual Report , 4-11.

3. Hoover’s Online (2004) Hewlett-Packard Company. Retrieved October 16, 2004 from
http://0-premium.hoovers.com.oasis.lib.tamuk.edu/subscribe/co/fin/xhtml


4. Ribeiro, J. (2004, February 11) HP sets up India Call Center. IDG News Service.
Retrieved October 16, 2004 from
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/0211hpsets.html

5. Rivlin, G. (2004, August 13). Hewlett profits come in lower then expected. New York
Times, pg. C.1.

www.slashdoc.com

Jumat, 02 Januari 2009

Vision, Mission & Corporate Social Responsibility Top 10 Companies IT

6. Cisco, Corporate Social Responsibility

Corporate Social Responsibility practices are tightly integrated into culture and business and fall into four key areas: how treat employees, environmental impact, investments in global communities and governance practices.

7. Delphi Social Responsibility

At Delphi, shared company vision is to be recognized by customers as their best supplier. Achieving that vision requires to have a deep passion for excellence, a passion to exceed customers' expectations at every opportunity. Delphi's Foundation for Excellence -- and the Delphi Principles... provide the cultural framework to guide actions. Delphi hold itselves accountable to the highest standards of conduct relative to responsibility to society and strive to build and maintain effective relationships with the communities and institutions with which we interact.

Delphi is fully committed to the goal of operating all of facilities, foreign and domestic, legally, ethically, and responsibly. Delphi have comprehensive corporate policies and practices concerning conduct designed to ensure that Delphi is a good and responsible corporate citizen globally and that Delphi complies with the laws of the various countries in which operate.

8. Apple Not Found

9. Oracle's Accessibility Program

"Oracle is committed to creating accessible technologies and products that enhance the overall workplace environment and contribute to the productivity of our employees, our customers, and our customers' customers."
—Safra Catz, President and CFO, Oracle

"Oracle's business is information—how to manage it, use it, share it, protect it. Our commitment to create products that simplify, standardize and automate extends to all users, including users who are disabled."
—Edward Screven, Chief Corporate Architect, Oracle

For many reasons—legal, business, and ethical—Oracle recognizes the need for applications, and customers' and partners' products built with tools, to be usable by the disabled community. The Oracle Accessibility Program Office, reporting to the office of the Chief Corporate Architect, is responsible for defining the corporate standards for accessibility, and developing materials to train all employees so that they can successfully create products that meet those standards.

10. Xerox Vision

Xerox is committed to the protection of the environment. Xerox see sustainability, not as a cost of doing business but as the way xerox do business.
As a corporate citizen, xerox share in a crucial legacy – to sustain the Earth’s precious resources for future generations.

Source :
www.cisco.com
www.delphi.com
www.apple.com
www.oracle.com
www.xerox.com